Tuesday 30 September 2014

Wednesday, October 1, 2014


Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Luke 5:27-39

It shouldn’t be surprising that some people, represented here by the Pharisees, looked down on aspects of Jesus’ ministry. They were probably fine with Jesus calling people to repentance (5:32), but the social interaction with sinners was the problem. Imagine, in our day, how different the level and tone of discourse around contentious issues would be if, instead of picketing or name-calling, the first thing we (or any group) did was to get to know the ‘enemy,’ the ‘other.’ 

As the Church discerns its ministry in the world, especially sensitive to the needs of those beyond its walls, there will be movements and expressions that those already within the fold will find lacking or problematic in some way. The Jesus we have in today’s passage isn’t dismissing the old wine, but in radically welcoming everyone, I sense that his listeners are being called to sensitively co-exist with others, matching the wine to the proper wineskin. 

Just as Jesus didn’t jettison fasting outright (5:35), those of us who like our music or liturgy a certain way can (I hope!) remain confident that there will be a place for us to worship in a way that we find spiritually nourishing. No matter what group or style with which we associate I hope that we can all live together in a productive and supportive relationship, rather than let our differences ruin our cloaks and wineskins. 

- Matthew Kieswetter

Monday 29 September 2014

Tuesday, September 30, 2014


Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Hosea 4:1-10

Hosea was a prophet operating in the Northern Kingdom after Israel had split in two. In today’s passage his message is particularly critical of the priests. As their religious system was largely based on a sacrificial system, so the priests, ironically, benefitted from the sins of the people (in that they depended on the sin offerings brought by people). 

They feed on the sin of my people; they are greedy for their iniquity.

This has me reflecting on my experience at seminary over the past year and a bit. I have met some amazing folks, and indeed, the Church will have some gifted, creative, and energetic leaders in the years to come. But there is a tension in the seminary experience in that on one hand we are to be outward-oriented, aimed at developing our capacity for helping and journeying with others, while on the other hand, it is easy to fall into a trap of smugness and self-satisfaction; thinking that one’s approach or view is 100% perfect and correct, and anyone who differs is therefore wrong. I think a lot of students, from time to time, fall back into recalling and criticizing the unpleasant experiences that they're trying to get away from (i.e. "I was unhappy when x, which made me y and brought me here, to become a priest and fix everything and everyone else"). 

  When our motivation is a primarily negative (and pride-filled) one, I think we’re in trouble. While one's spiritual formation and personal maturity are very important parts of a theological program, we seminarians need to remember that we are also here for all of God’s people. Perhaps more succinctly, all aspects, including personal development, are for the service of more than just the individual. Likewise, all Christians are called to look beyond themselves. Next time you’re at a church service and you find yourself disagreeing with some aspect of the liturgy, remember that there is probably someone there for whom it is a meaningful experience, even if your view is technically right. As long as we’re coming together, praying, and breaking bread, we’re on the right track.

- Matthew Kieswetter

Sunday 28 September 2014

Monday, September 29, 2014 (St. Michael and All Angels)


Monday, September 29, 2014
Daniel 12:1-3  (St. Michael and All Angels)
Today’s reading is part of a cryptic vision recorded in Daniel 11-12.  Daniel did not understand it himself, and he was told to seal it up until the end of time, so it’s no surprise if we can’t understand it either.  The extract for today mentions Michael, who had charge of Daniel’s people, but it doesn’t say anything further about him, not even that he is an angel (as the Bible tells us elsewhere).  Sadly, some people have for centuries run off into far-fetched imaginary fairy tales about angels while paying no attention to the tiny bit that the Bible does tell us.   Doesn’t this lack of information mean that we really don’t need to know much about angels?  Instead, we should trust God, learn more about God from the Bible, and follow our Lord Jesus Christ, who reveals God to us.
Even in its cryptic context, today’s reading tells us something important, confirmed by other Bible teaching.  This is that there will be a resurrection of the dead at the time of the end, when (verse 2) “many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.”  
The discernment that Day will be on the basis (verse 1) of “who is found written in the book.”  Even this is mysterious, but three similar references in the Bible can help us understand.  
First, in Exodus 32:32-33, Moses pleads for God’s mercy to the people who have sinned greatly with the golden calf.  Moses asks the Lord, if the people cannot be forgiven, to “blot me out of the book that you have written.”  The Lord says no, only those who have sinned against the Lord will be blotted out.  
Second is Luke 10:20.  Jesus sent out 70 disciples to cure the sick and proclaim the kingdom of God, and they returned rejoicing that the demons submitted to them.   Jesus told them, “Do not rejoice at this, that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.”  Remember that angels are spirits and the devil has his angels too, against whom Michael’s angels will fight; see Rev. 12:7-9.  Jesus lets us know what is important: our salvation recorded in heaven, not any dominance over angels.  
Third is Rev. 20:11-15, which talks clearly about the resurrection of the dead and the final judgment.  This passage gives a picture of the final judgment as a scene in which books are opened and all people are judged according to their deeds recorded in the books.  Another book is opened, the book of life, “and anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.”
Somber words indeed these are (as is our reading from Daniel 12).  Dislike it as much as we do, we must acknowledge the Bible teaches this.  But this teaching must always be tempered with the Gospel.  Hebrews 9:27-28 does so succinctly:  “And just as it is appointed for mortals to die once, and after that the judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.”
Sadly, our usual pictures of the final judgment and the condemnation of evil are based more on fanciful medieval art and poetry than on the Bible.  They mean to terrify us, not to inspire and encourage us.  Thus we learn to run from what the Bible does teach, and that is a tragedy.
Let me conclude with a word picture of the final judgment, one that is fully based on the Bible, and one I find encouraging.  A courtroom scene has four principal participants:  the defendant on trial, the judge (who, with no jury, makes the decision), the prosecutor (who accuses the defendant of wrongdoing), and the defense counsel (who represents and helps the defendant refute the prosecutor).  At the end of the age, we are told that you and I and all people will be on trial, the defendants.  Let’s see what the Bible says about the other three participants.
Our culture often portrays the judge as God the Creator (or St. Peter as a joke), sometimes as a sleepy old man, sometimes as austere, cold, and distant, with no care at all for us.  Not so:  John 5:21-29 (especially v. 22) tells us exactly what Jesus taught about the final judgment: “The Father judges no one but has given all judgment to the Son.”  No, our judge is not distant and austere; our judge is the Lord Jesus, who as a human being is one of us and understands us, who loves sinners so much, who forgives people before they ask, who extends mercy to everyone in trouble, who never asks for anything in return, but who shows love at all times.  There’s not a hint in the Bible that the character of Jesus has changed since he walked this earth (the medieval artists are scandalously wrong), and at the final judgment we shall meet exactly the same gracious, loving, and forgiving Lord Jesus the Bible presents.
The prosecutor will be as the Bible presents him, too.  He accuses the defendant of crime and evil, and there is one character in the Bible whose very name, Satan, means accuser.  Revelation 12:7-11 spells it out:  He is called the great dragon (against whom Michael and his angels fight), that ancient serpent, the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world.  A loud voice in heaven proclaims, “The accuser of the brothers and sisters has been thrown down, who accuses them day and night before our God.”  That’s the prosecutor, and he has been thrown down; his power is broken.
Finally, we have our defense attorney, the one who stands beside us on trial, the one who represents us, our advocate, the one who helps and speaks for us.  In John 14:15, 15:26, and 16:7, Jesus refers to the Holy Spirit with the Greek word parakletos, which means an advocate or a helper.  Some years ago I was told that parakletos in Koine Greek was the usual term for the defense attorney in a trial.  So the picture is complete, summed up in Romans 8:26-27:  “Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but that very Spirit intercedes for us with sighs too deep for words.  And God, who searches the heart, knows what is the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.”  
Could we ask for a better defense attorney than that, God’s own Holy Spirit?
- Robert Kruse

Saturday 27 September 2014

Sunday, September 28, 2014


Sunday, September 28, 2014
James 3:1-13

“From the same mouth come blessing and cursing.”

One of my university professors often said, “Doctors bury their mistakes. Lawyers incarcerate their mistakes. But, teachers duplicate their mistakes.” I think of that quote now as I read James’ reflection on the power of the tongue. In fact, James begins by reminding his readers to think twice before becoming teachers, because teachers will be held to a higher standard.

From my years teaching high school religion, I know how true James’ advice is. I’ve had former students say, “I remember when you taught us…” and I would cringe because I was mistaken in the way I told it or because I no longer held that view.

Even more in everyday life, the power to duplicate our mistakes is overwhelming. James says we have the power to curse those who are made in the likeness of God. When we forget that our brothers and sisters (or even our enemies) are beloved of God, we have the ability to unleash a stream of unkind or even hateful speech towards them. Do this enough and we duplicate our mistakes. Others begin to believe what we tell them: they are not good enough or worthy enough or loved at all.

On the other hand, we have the power with our speech to remind others just how loved they are. The L’Arche movement turns fifty years old this year. People with and without intellectual disabilities live and work together and help each other grow in their humanity. L’Arche has a beautiful tradition of celebrating birthday parties. Community members plan the day in all the usual ways by making a delicious meal, decorating the house, and wrapping gifts. But after the dinner plates are cleared, each guest in turns holds a candle and lets the guest of honor know how special he or she is. Time after time, I’ve seen the power of simple words of affirmation. The first time I celebrated my birthday in L’Arche, the kind words of the guests moved me to tears.

Since then, I’ve often wondered, how can I duplicate this tradition outside of birthday parties? Passing on kind and encouraging words is never a mistake.

- David Shumaker

Friday 26 September 2014

Saturday, September 27, 2014


Saturday, September 27, 2014
Hosea 1:1 - 2:1

Talk about getting a point across! Remind me never to ask God to host The Dating Game. It is so interesting that God doesn’t just convey a message to the prophet Hosea. God makes him live it. God doesn’t just give him words to preach to the people of the Northern Kingdom; God invites/instructs Hosea to feel what it is like to have a pact with a rebellious, unfaithful partner. That Gomer is a prostitute or promiscuous woman is not just a powerful metaphor. It’s likely a reference to the way in which the people of the Northern Kingdom had fallen into the worship of pagan deities, and participation in fertility rites.

Even though punishment is foretold (i.e. the invasion of the North by the Assyrians), God still stands by his people, as expressed in the words of hope that end chapter one and begin chapter two. And God isn’t oblivious to that very basic human need for offspring. Just look at the covenant with Abraham from Genesis 22, and alluded to in Hosea 10:10. 


“I will indeed bless you, and I will make your offspring as numerous as the stars of heaven and as the sand that is on the seashore.” (Genesis 22:17)

I think we need to recognize that there is a profound difference in accepting God’s promises, that is, living in relationship with God through trust, rather than by trying to manipulate nature and its gods through fertility rites. (For an interesting meditation on this, check out the ORIGINAL film The Wicker Man -- NOT the REMAKE.) 


Is your own personal lived faith, and our shared faith, marked by trust and faithfulness? Or is it characterized by self-centredness and the ‘twisting of God’s arm?’ To get more specific, what about your ideas about the crucifixion? Faith and love, or basically a pagan sacrifice?

- Matthew Kieswetter

Thursday 25 September 2014

Friday, September 26, 2014



Friday, September 26, 2014
Luke 4:31-37

                It seems that one of Jesus’ regular activities was the casting out of demons. This can be hard for us to relate to, as fear (or experience) of the demonic is not so widespread today. Many commentators associate it with what we consider mental illness, but no matter what is being referred to in the gospel stories, Jesus is unafraid, and he heals those who suffered and were outcasts. 

                I’m intrigued at how the man with the demon was in the synagogue, a place of religious instruction (and interesting that the demon identifies Jesus as the Holy One of God!). This setting and Jesus’ quick dealing with the demon takes my mind to contemporary situations where there is unrest and a lack of health in worshipping communities. I’m not saying that dissenters are demoniacs (we all disagree at one point or another), but I’m struck by how Jesus confronts the demon. Ignoring the plea “let us alone!” Jesus shakes things up. In our places of worship and instruction there are times when we need to let Jesus take care of our problems: our unhealthiness, discord, dysfunction. The walls we build around us, our cries of “what have you to do with us?!” must be replaced by an openness to transformation. 

                How does our story end? The demon comes out of the man without doing him any harm. And word of Jesus spreads throughout the region.
               
-          Matthew Kieswetter

Wednesday 24 September 2014

Thursday, September 25, 2014


Thursday, September 25, 2014
Luke 4:14-30

In Luke’s gospel, Jesus is presented in the same terms as the great prophets of the Old Testament, who acted as commentators on the social injustices of the time. Prophets often walk a lonely road, because their message is rarely a comfortable one. Though Jesus’s sermon strikes the listeners as a rejection, if we go deeper into the words, he speaks of a great deal of hope: of the far-reaching goodness that God brings to the oppressed – those known and unknown to God.

Hope is a paradox, because it requires a measure of despair to be true. One cannot hope without a hint of uncertainty in the back of the mind. The great prophets felt great despair at the sight of the people of God turning from God. Yet they continued to call out these dark truths and spoke of the forgiveness of God, wondering if one day that forgiveness might not come, and hoping that some day the people would change.

Jesus’s sermon is an opening to follow him on a way forward. I don’t know if he knows which way “forward” is. But I do know that he trusts and hopes that it is good.

- Joshua Zentner-Barrett

Tuesday 23 September 2014

Wednesday, September 24, 2014


Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Psalm 82: A psalm of Asaph.   

While this is the shortest of the psalms, it is by no means the easiest to interpret. Is this a meeting God convenes to lecture his bad angels? I don’t think so. The evidence points us in another direction. In verse 6, God says: 
“I said, ‘You are “gods”; you are all sons of the Most High.”
To get at this we have to go back to the Hebrew. “Gods” in this passage translates as Elohim, meaning judges or those with power. So the psalm starts with God standing and judging. Like Hebrew judges he may sit to listen to cases, but he stands to make a judgement and this time he is judging those who are placed in the position of power or judgement over others in Israel. I believe he is judging the judges whose position makes them like gods. This psalm clearly indicates that their power does not come from the king or ruler but from God. They are expected to act like God when they sit in place of God in any judgement seat, not simply pass judgements convenient for the leaders of the nation. So by the time we get to verse 2, their job is given honour, but their behaviour in that job is condemned.
These judges favour the unjust and the wicked. If you add the rich and the influential, God could be speaking directly to judges and leaders in our own time. God demands that they:
“Defend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed.
Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked”(3-4)
  God says that because such judges refuse to dispense the justice of God, they know nothing, they understand nothing and 
“They walk about in darkness; all the foundations of the earth are shaken.” (v5)
Here is an interesting idea. If the foundations of the earth are shaken by the blind biases of earthly judges, that fact implies all things in Creation may well be connected to the judgement leaders impose, including the health of the environment and the survival of plant and animal species in the world.
Finally, God reminds the judges that while they do the work of God as sons of the Most High, they in fact are still human and will die like mere mortals. God reminds them that they will fall like every other ruler. In this way, God brings the judges of the earth up short and reminds them who it is gives them their power and their authority. And whose compassionate judgement they are to emulate. So these bad judges are told to mend their ways not just for the sake of the poor and oppressed, but for the sake of all the foundations of the earth!
The psalm ends with the singer begging God to rise up and judge the earth, stating that all the nations are God’s inheritance. The psalm itself seems to me to be the psalmist’s imagined gathering, where God brings all the judges of Israel or perhaps of the whole world together and lectures them on what they should be doing instead of the corrupt practices into which they have allowed themselves to fall. 
Certainly, some earthly judges and leaders will never stop being corrupted. I wonder if the singer of the psalm recognized this fact when he begged God to step in. This call for God to step in and bring justice is seen in many psalms. Old Testament people frequently looked to God to step in and fix the problems of the world. Such a request is built into many of our prayers and hymns to this day. 
An interesting footnote to this psalm is that Jesus referenced Psalm 82, when debating with the Pharisees. (John 10:34-38) We now know that Jesus was the answer to that long chain of prayer begging God to step in. The surprise came when Jesus taught us that in our weakness, we could fix our own problems in his name and in the power of the Spirit. 
Psalm 82 remains a dynamic call for justice in a corrupt world and a warning to those in power to use their office to care for the helpless and needy. Are any of our leaders, judges and those we consider to be ‘gods’ listening?
- Peter Mansell, September 16, 2014

Monday 22 September 2014

Tuesday, September 23, 2014


Tuesday September 23, 2014 
Acts18:12-28

Today’s reading drops us abruptly into the middle of a long account of Paul’s travels around the eastern Mediterranean, as he preaches and teaches the Gospel of Christ in places that have never before heard it.  To make sense of the reading, we need some background.

The earlier part of Paul’s missionary story (Acts 13:1 – 16:8) is in towns and cities of areas now in Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, and Cyprus.  When he and his companions were in Troas (the main seaport in what is now northwest Turkey), Paul had a vision that God wanted them to cross the Bosporus into what is now Greece, where the missionary work continues, sometimes received warmly but more often rejected, even with violence.

Philippi was the first town Paul and his companions stayed in.  (It is about 10km inland from present-day Kavala, Greece, right at the top end of the Aegean Sea.)  Wherever Paul went, his custom was to worship every Sabbath with his fellow Jews in the local synagogue and to talk about Jesus at every opportunity.  But Philippi was a Roman Imperial city with little Jewish presence and no synagogue.  Even so, on the Sabbath the missionaries found a small group of women praying down by the river, and these women gave them a warm welcome.  One, a wealthy merchant named Lydia, became a Christian believer and a generous sponsor of Paul’s work.  But Philippi was a very pagan place, and conflicts soon arose.  You know the story (Acts 16:16-40) of how Paul and Silas, badly beaten by the city authorities, were praying and singing in the town jail when God delivered them with an earthquake, and their jailor and his household were converted and baptized.  But the missionaries, injured as they were, were still forced to leave town.

The next city they stayed in was Thessalonica (at the northwest corner of the Aegean Sea), where (Acts 17:1-9) there was a Jewish synagogue, and Paul proclaimed Jesus as the Messiah.  A few of the Jews were converted, along with many Greeks, but some of the Jews recruited a mob and dragged the believers into court.  Paul and his companions had to get out of town that very night.  They went to Beroea (about 50km west), where (Acts 17:10-15) the people in the Jewish synagogue were more receptive and learned a great deal before Jews from Thessalonica came and stirred up the town against the missionaries.  Again, they had to leave in a hurry.

After this, the believers took Paul to Athens (about 350km south), where he, apparently alone, was to wait for his companions to rejoin him.  Athens (Acts 17:16-34) was an intellectual place but overwhelmingly pagan (rather like a university town), with philosophers of all sorts, some of whom enjoyed talking with Paul, as with anyone who brought strange new ideas that seemed interesting.  Paul began presenting Jesus not only in the synagogue (as usual) but in the marketplace, talking with anyone who was interested.  Before long, some of the more prominent intellectuals noticed him, and he was invited to come to the erudite circle of people who gathered at the Aeropagus (a hill opposite the Acropolis, centre of pagan worship).  Paul was invited to deliver a lecture to the philosophical assembly, many of whom were rather interested, and a few became believers.  Others, however, full of doubts and questions, derided Paul when he spoke about the resurrection of the dead.

Thus Paul left Athens and went on to Corinth (about 70km west), a commercial city with people from all over the Roman Empire.   That’s where today’s part of the story begins.  Please read all of Acts 18 to get a better idea of what happens.

I wonder if Paul may have been rather discouraged by the time he reached Corinth.  Yes, he had had some success and some converts in all the cities he had visited, but he had had much rejection too, violent rejection by the Romans in Philippi, hateful rejection by the Jews of Thessalonica, and more subtle intellectual rejection by the elite of Athens.  Paul was not only a Jewish scholar, but he was well educated in Hellenistic culture and familiar with the classic Greek literature.  Surely he must have known about Athens all his life; finally he had opportunity to be there and meet people who were his intellectual equals; perhaps he secretly hoped the Gospel would be accepted and he could settle into that attractive community.   But it was not to be.

Corinth was a very different city than Athens, and Paul was very much alone, as his missionary companions had not yet rejoined him.  Perhaps those first, isolated days in Corinth were some of the times of great difficulty of which Paul speaks in his epistles (for example, 1 Cor. 4:9-13).  But God does not leave his own people in despair, those who have given up everything to follow Christ.  God is faithful.  God provides a way, often unexpected, and usually through other people.  

That’s what happened for Paul.  He met (at synagogue?) a man named Aquila, a fellow Jew who had the same trade (a tentmaker) that Paul had practiced before he became a full-time missionary.  Aquila too, with his wife Priscilla, had just been through a major crisis:  The emperor Claudius Caesar had expelled all the Jews from Rome, and Aquila and Priscilla had to flee from Rome for their lives, leaving behind all their property, and ending up in Corinth.  Now, refugees, they were just starting to get back on their feet, and they welcomed Paul to stay with them and work together at their trade.  So Paul was again a tentmaker, but one who talked about Jesus every Sabbath at synagogue.  Priscilla, Aquila, and Paul became close, lifelong friends who were soon working together for the Gospel as well as in tentmaking.  

I wonder, too, if Priscilla may not have contributed to Paul’s teaching, especially in the ways in which Paul opens doors to women and women’s leadership, something foreign to his Jewish background.  Although in Acts 18:2 the author names Aquila first, as was customary, most of the following references (starting with verse 18) name Priscilla first.  Perhaps she took more of the spiritual leadership than her husband, and she was an influence for good in the Pauline churches and for Paul himself.  That’s conjecture, not something we can know.

There’s a point of culture, easy to overlook, showing how Paul was not only consoled by Priscilla and Aquila but was brought to greater humility at this time.  In the Hellenistic world, it was commonplace for wandering philosophers (like Paul) to give some lectures, answer questions, and go their way.  The most prestigious of these philosophers had private sponsors, wealthy patrons who would pay their expenses, giving the philosophers some independence.  Paul had been in this privileged position with Lydia, who sponsored him in Philippi and perhaps afterwards.  Many wandering philosophers, however, had no patron and solicited their audiences for donations.  The lowest class of wandering philosophers couldn’t raise money that way and had to do unrelated work to make their own living; they didn’t get much respect.  It was this lowest class that Paul now joined as a tentmaker.  So he learned humility.

Our account in Acts 18:5-17 picks out only a few incidents in the extended time (at least a year and a half) Paul spent in Corinth.  As usual, he started in the synagogue, but again he had to leave when he was opposed and reviled.  This time, however, he only went next door and held church in the home of a Gentile believer.  The ruler of the synagogue, too, became a believer, and Paul baptized him (1 Cor. 1:14).  Even after Paul left synagogue, some of the Jews were so opposed that they dragged him before the Roman magistrate, who had the good sense not to interfere in other people’s religion, and who therefore refused to hear the Jews’ complaint that Paul was teaching new doctrines.

In verses 18-19 we learn that Paul finally left Corinth after an extended time, taking Priscilla and Aquila with him.  They stayed in Ephesus while Paul went on all the way to Jerusalem before returning to the churches in Asia Minor, where he seems to be well received.  Paul eventually returned to Ephesus for a prolonged stay.

Our event-packed reading for today concludes with one more incident (verses 24-28) after Paul has left Ephesus.  Apollos, a Jew from Alexandria (in North Africa), came to Ephesus.  He was an eloquent, educated speaker, knowledgeable in the Scriptures, who knew something of the Way of Jesus.  Priscilla and Aquila took him aside and taught him more fully about the Way.  Eventually, he decided to go to Achaia, to Corinth, where he greatly helped the church and disputed with the Jews.  Thus God provided new leadership in Corinth to help the church continue its growth from where Paul had left off.  Paul and Apollos later met, became respected colleagues, and worked together to advance the Gospel.

The Scriptures are written for our instruction, and the stories of Paul, of Priscilla and Aquila, and of Apollos are written as examples for us, especially so we can learn from their attitudes and experiences.  Some people are more forward, like Paul, the pioneer.  Some have a more individualized ministry, like Priscilla, who helped others to cope with problems and to grow in the Lord.  Some, like Apollos, have a ministry that builds on the pioneering work of others and helps God’s people grow in faith and knowledge.  God accepts and uses all kinds of people, each in our own way, but always calling us to be faithful and devoted to Christ at all times and in every situation.  With God’s grace and strength, may we fulfill our call.


If you would like to learn more about the social setting in Corinth, two books I recommend are:

A Week in the Life of Corinth by Ben Witherington III (an eminent New Testament scholar), IVP Academic, 2012, 158 pages.  This short and engaging novella says a lot about what Corinth was like.  Paulos, Priscilla, and Aquila all make appearances, along with others, not from the Bible.

The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul by Wayne A. Meeks, Yale University Press, 1983, 299 pages.  This is the classic, scholarly introduction to its subject, very well written, accessible, and easy to read.


- Robert Kruse